Skip to main content

Best place to buy a wooden recurve bow in the 68-70 inch range

I have very little archery experience beyond camp when I was a kid, and am now a dad to two. My younger child is getting into archery with a compound bow, and I recently bought our first decent-quality arrows which are a big step up from the plastic-fletched ones that I bought to go with the bow before.

My question now is where to get a recurve bow for myself (once I sort this out, I'll get a slightly smaller one for my older child). I'd like it to be wooden and decent-quality, and my wingspan dictates that it be 68-70". I wasn't comfortable buying from Amazon as there's so little choice and there are mixed reviews of the ones available there, plus many are metal.

I'm pretty strong and would like to practice for hunting. I'm aware that most Olympic archers shoot with a 50-pound draw or even less. I wouldn't like a draw less than 50 pounds for this reason, but am still open to suggestions.

I'd like to keep the cost of the bow under $200 but will take all suggestions gladly.

Thank you!

submitted by /u/jeff_varszegi
[link] [comments]

from newest submissions : Archery https://ift.tt/2NC1ccg
via

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy St. Crispin's Day!

Battle of Agincourt From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ​ Part of the Hundred Years' War Date 25 October 1415 (Saint Crispin's Day) Location Azincourt, County of Saint-Pol (now Pas-de-Calais) Result English victory ​ The Battle of Agincourt French: Azincourt was an English victory in the Hundred Years' War. It took place on 25 October 1415 (Saint Crispin's Day) near Azincourt, in northern France.[b] The unexpected English victory against the numerically superior French army boosted English morale and prestige, crippled France and started a new period of English dominance in the war. ​ After several decades of relative peace, the English had resumed the war in 1415 amid the failure of negotiations with the French. In the ensuing campaign, many soldiers died from disease, and the English numbers dwindled; they tried to withdraw to English-held Calais but found their path blocked by a considerably larger French army. Despite the numerical disadvantage, the ba

New Archers: What information do you need to know, and how do you find it?

One thing that I love about this community compared to other online archery forums is that it's got a good mix of experience. It's also where a lot of new archers seem to come for advice when starting out. That's great! However, it can be frustrating to give good advice without the correct information. Every body is different, and so every archer's setup and starting point is going to be a little different too. Eye dominance: For any shooting sport, it's important to know which eye is dominant because that's the eye that you will naturally aim with. There are several different tests that you can do, but the one that I've found to be most simple is to hold your hands up with your fingers and thumbs extended and overlap them so that they make a triangle. Look at an object in the distance through that triangle. Then you can either close each eye (one at a time) or bring your hands back to your face while continuing to look at the object. The eye that keeps

A Historical Defense of Lars Anderson

If you've been on an archery forum in the last few years, you've seen the discussions about Lars Anderson and his speed shooting videos. The comments across the internet about his videos are almost universally negative. You wouldn't believe the hate this guy gets. In a way, it's understandable. In his videos, Lars essentially claims that modern archers have lost many of the techniques that made ancient archers so formidable, and that through his readings of ancient archery manuals, he was able to rediscover some of those techniques. He then demonstrates that by using those techniques, he has become the fastest speed shooter alive today. And oh my god, those claims set the archery world on fire. The amount of hate he got then, and continues to get, is insane.These are VERY bold claims, and it's only natural to be skeptical. However, I find most of his critics to be disingenuous. And through my own readings of the early archery writings, I find that Lars is a lot c