Skip to main content

Any clout shooters that use longbows... What's your setup?

Having shot clout last year using my Olympic recurve turned barebow I'd like to try again later this year but use a more traditional English longbow

From the general chit chat at the shoot most were shooting 40-50# longbows with the one +60# bow which won that division... Is this my go to draw weight?

I don't think I'll have any issue with tuning the bow/arrows I end up getting, but do I need to consider draw technique and draw length into this... I'm a short draw archer 26.5" and using a modern 45# ilf, shot using my Olympic recurve anchor, did okay last time out

Will the sudden jump in poundage be an issue? Will shooting an equivalent 45# longbow require me to sky draw/shoot it to get to 180 yards compared to my ilf barebow... Are there any performance differences between selfbows and laminated longbows or am I looking at getting some kinda shoulder injury inducing 100# warbow!

I'm not looking to break records, this is more for fun but also do well enough for it to be enjoyable... So just after some information on bows, personal experience and any potential issues to look out for

submitted by /u/B12KHX
[link] [comments]

from newest submissions : Archery https://ift.tt/2S4lh07
via

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy St. Crispin's Day!

Battle of Agincourt From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ​ Part of the Hundred Years' War Date 25 October 1415 (Saint Crispin's Day) Location Azincourt, County of Saint-Pol (now Pas-de-Calais) Result English victory ​ The Battle of Agincourt French: Azincourt was an English victory in the Hundred Years' War. It took place on 25 October 1415 (Saint Crispin's Day) near Azincourt, in northern France.[b] The unexpected English victory against the numerically superior French army boosted English morale and prestige, crippled France and started a new period of English dominance in the war. ​ After several decades of relative peace, the English had resumed the war in 1415 amid the failure of negotiations with the French. In the ensuing campaign, many soldiers died from disease, and the English numbers dwindled; they tried to withdraw to English-held Calais but found their path blocked by a considerably larger French army. Despite the numerical disadvantage, the ba...

New Archers: What information do you need to know, and how do you find it?

One thing that I love about this community compared to other online archery forums is that it's got a good mix of experience. It's also where a lot of new archers seem to come for advice when starting out. That's great! However, it can be frustrating to give good advice without the correct information. Every body is different, and so every archer's setup and starting point is going to be a little different too. Eye dominance: For any shooting sport, it's important to know which eye is dominant because that's the eye that you will naturally aim with. There are several different tests that you can do, but the one that I've found to be most simple is to hold your hands up with your fingers and thumbs extended and overlap them so that they make a triangle. Look at an object in the distance through that triangle. Then you can either close each eye (one at a time) or bring your hands back to your face while continuing to look at the object. The eye that keeps ...

A Historical Defense of Lars Anderson

If you've been on an archery forum in the last few years, you've seen the discussions about Lars Anderson and his speed shooting videos. The comments across the internet about his videos are almost universally negative. You wouldn't believe the hate this guy gets. In a way, it's understandable. In his videos, Lars essentially claims that modern archers have lost many of the techniques that made ancient archers so formidable, and that through his readings of ancient archery manuals, he was able to rediscover some of those techniques. He then demonstrates that by using those techniques, he has become the fastest speed shooter alive today. And oh my god, those claims set the archery world on fire. The amount of hate he got then, and continues to get, is insane.These are VERY bold claims, and it's only natural to be skeptical. However, I find most of his critics to be disingenuous. And through my own readings of the early archery writings, I find that Lars is a lot c...