Skip to main content

Bowstring STILL slapping my wrist

About a week or so ago, I went on to Reddit in order to talk about my bow string hitting my wrist. Mind you, I've done everything from keeping my alignment correct, my grip correct, and my released correct. I've also tryed to increase the brace height by twisting the bowstring more. And yes, I've also opened my elbow when shooting.

Strangely, after all the advice I was given the last time I posted here, the bowstring no matter what, the bow would keep on hitting my wrist. Every single time. The brace height is about 8 inches, so when I hold the bow string, it is about middle my forearm. Strangely enough whenever I shoot my bow, it ends up hitting about five or six centimetres down from the middle of my forearm onto my wrist.

I don't understand, is this something wrong I'm doing or is the bow just being weird. I can't place it because I studied so much online trying to find what was wrong with me trying to find techniques that might fix the problem but nothing ever has.

Concenquently, this has become incredibly annoying. Is this my bow or something dumb I'm doing?

submitted by /u/TheDashingPigeon
[link] [comments]

from newest submissions : Archery https://ift.tt/3wIftsq
via

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Happy St. Crispin's Day!

Battle of Agincourt From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ​ Part of the Hundred Years' War Date 25 October 1415 (Saint Crispin's Day) Location Azincourt, County of Saint-Pol (now Pas-de-Calais) Result English victory ​ The Battle of Agincourt French: Azincourt was an English victory in the Hundred Years' War. It took place on 25 October 1415 (Saint Crispin's Day) near Azincourt, in northern France.[b] The unexpected English victory against the numerically superior French army boosted English morale and prestige, crippled France and started a new period of English dominance in the war. ​ After several decades of relative peace, the English had resumed the war in 1415 amid the failure of negotiations with the French. In the ensuing campaign, many soldiers died from disease, and the English numbers dwindled; they tried to withdraw to English-held Calais but found their path blocked by a considerably larger French army. Despite the numerical disadvantage, the ba...

New Archers: What information do you need to know, and how do you find it?

One thing that I love about this community compared to other online archery forums is that it's got a good mix of experience. It's also where a lot of new archers seem to come for advice when starting out. That's great! However, it can be frustrating to give good advice without the correct information. Every body is different, and so every archer's setup and starting point is going to be a little different too. Eye dominance: For any shooting sport, it's important to know which eye is dominant because that's the eye that you will naturally aim with. There are several different tests that you can do, but the one that I've found to be most simple is to hold your hands up with your fingers and thumbs extended and overlap them so that they make a triangle. Look at an object in the distance through that triangle. Then you can either close each eye (one at a time) or bring your hands back to your face while continuing to look at the object. The eye that keeps ...

A Historical Defense of Lars Anderson

If you've been on an archery forum in the last few years, you've seen the discussions about Lars Anderson and his speed shooting videos. The comments across the internet about his videos are almost universally negative. You wouldn't believe the hate this guy gets. In a way, it's understandable. In his videos, Lars essentially claims that modern archers have lost many of the techniques that made ancient archers so formidable, and that through his readings of ancient archery manuals, he was able to rediscover some of those techniques. He then demonstrates that by using those techniques, he has become the fastest speed shooter alive today. And oh my god, those claims set the archery world on fire. The amount of hate he got then, and continues to get, is insane.These are VERY bold claims, and it's only natural to be skeptical. However, I find most of his critics to be disingenuous. And through my own readings of the early archery writings, I find that Lars is a lot c...