Skip to main content

newbie at target archery, but looking for a sight i'll never need to replace

By

looking at the top level models of the Shibuya and the Axcel, as it seems both of these companies give you a free sight aperture with each sight. COrrect me if i'm wrong though please.

Anyway, the pricse are very similar, dose any one have direct experience with both, and an opinion on wihch is better?

Additionally, Shibuya has two versions of their most top end sights: the single mount and double mount. price change is very small. what is the difference between teh single and double mount, and if it seems clear that Shibuya is the way to go, should i be getting single or double mount?

Thanks a lot,

-Zach

submitted by /u/hcaz2420
[link] [comments]

from newest submissions : Archery https://ift.tt/3mZpDj1
via
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shibuya vs Axcel vs other top end sights?

By
So my budget has increased and i decided i'm going for a top-level sight for the target style recurve i'm building. It seems that Shibuya and Axcel are the top end, so for anyone who has experience with either one of them, or preferably both, could you tell me the differences, pros and cons, and which one is the best value? i'm planning on buying the most expensive, so the Axcel Achieve XP - Recurve or the Shibuya Ultima RC PRO Carbon Sight . If there's any other top end sights you think are better, let me know. I want this to be the first and last sight that i ever buy, and price doesn't really matter. Another question, on the Shibuya there's an option for "Single mount" and "Double mount." What do those mean? And lastly, is the sight aperture on either of the sights suitable, or is there better after-market apertures that are better? I'm sort of thinking that is something I should be buying from my local shop so i can actually te...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there any reason mediterranean and slavic draw shoot from opposite sides of the bow

By
When the release imparts the same twist on the string? It was my understanding that mediterranean draw has the arrow on the side opposite of the bow of the draw hand because of the twist imparted on the string affecting the arrow on release but that should mean that slavic draw would suffer from that problem. Am I missing something with this? Shouldn't that mean you could use a mediterranean draw on the same side of the bow as the draw hand and not have issues? Thanks in advance submitted by /u/xxxJakkxxx [link] [comments] from newest submissions : Archery https://ift.tt/3gKTf2e via
Post a Comment
Read more